THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU
Thông tin cơ bản
Định dạng | |
---|---|
Số trang | 116 |
Dung lượng | 9,36 MB |
Nội dung
Ngày đăng: 23/07/2016, 20:24
Nguồn tham khảo
Tài liệu tham khảo | Loại | Chi tiết | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
22:6n-3 n-3 C18PUFAn-3 LC-PUFALine of Equality (Day 0) 1st phase (week 2, day 14) 2nd phase (week 5, day 35) 3rd phase (week 8, day 56)Figure 3 Fatty acid composition of trout fillet for the two experimental treatment groups (VO/FO and UF/FO) expressed as a per cent fraction of fatty acid composition observed in the UF/FO group relative to the VO/FO group.Values were computed from fatty acid (FA) composition (% w/w) as FA (UF/FOgroup) FA (VO/FO group) ã 100. Based onthis calculation, a value of 100% repre- sents equality between tissue profiles, as it was at time zero, the commencement of the experimental finishing period. See Table 2 for fatty acid class abbrevia- tions.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Aquaculture Nutrition 18; 441–456 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd | Sách, tạp chí |
|
||||||
22:5n-3 0.99 ± 0.03 1.14 ± 0.07 ns 1.13 ± 0.02 1.22 ± 0.08 ns 1.15 ± 0.06 1.07 ± 0.07 ns 22:6n-3 7.43 ± 0.26 9.52 ± 0.08 ** 8.06 ± 0.23 8.14 ± 0.30 ns 1.28 ± 0.04 1.01 ± 0.04 **SFA 19.93 ± 0.12 20.21 ± 0.45 ns 20.61 ± 0.11 20.96 ± 0.83 ns 1.01 ± 0.03 1.02 ± 0.05 ns MUFA 32.69 ± 0.10 32.35 ± 0.36 ns 34.11 ± 0.09 33.65 ± 0.79 ns 0.99 ± 0.01 0.99 ± 0.02 ns PUFA 47.38 ± 0.16 47.44 ± 0.71 ns 45.28 ± 0.14 45.39 ± 1.61 ns 1.00 ± 0.02 1.00 ± 0.04 ns n-6 C 18 PUFA 22.60 ± 0.28 21.32 ± 0.43 ns 20.74 ± 0.24 21.12 ± 1.49 ns 0.94 ± 0.03 1.02 ± 0.07 ns n-3 C 18 PUFA 10.56 ± 0.13 9.38 ± 0.27 * 9.47 ± 0.11 9.05 ± 0.57 ns 0.89 ± 0.03 0.96 ± 0.06 ns n-6 LC-PUFA 2.66 ± 0.10 2.50 ± 0.05 ns 2.55 ± 0.09 2.54 ± 0.07 ns 0.94 ± 0.05 1.00 ± 0.01 ns n-3 LC-PUFA 11.56 ± 0.38 14.24 ± 0.15 ** 12.53 ± 0.33 12.68 ± 0.48 ns 1.23 ± 0.03 1.01 ± 0.04 **Data represent means ± standard error (n = 3; N = 6). Within each couple of data set, the results of the independent T-test are reported as:*P < 0ặ05, **P < 0ặ01, ***P < 0ặ001; ns = not significant.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Aquaculture Nutrition 18; 441–456 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd | Sách, tạp chí |
|
||||||
(2001) Fat deposition and flesh quality in seawater reared, triploid brown trout (Salmo trutta) as affected by dietary fat levels and starvation. Aquaculture, 193, 325–345.Regost, C., Arzel, J., Cardinal, M., Rosenlund, G. & Kaushik, S.J.(2003a) Total replacement of fish oil by soybean or linseed oil with a return to fish oil in Turbot (Psetta maxima) 2. Flesh quality properties. Aquaculture, 220, 737–747.Regost, C., Arzel, J., Robin, J., Rosenlund, G. & Kaushik, S.J.(2003b) Total replacement of fish oil by soybean or linseed oil with a return to fish oil in turbot (Psetta maxima) – 1. Growth per- formance, flesh fatty acid profile, and lipid metabolism. Aquacul- ture, 217, 465–482.Robin, J.H., Regost, C., Arzel, J. & Kaushik, S.J. (2003) Fatty acid profile of fish following a change in dietary fatty acid source:. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Aquaculture Nutrition 18; 441–456 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd | Sách, tạp chí |
|
||||||
(1982), who reported that upon a period of food deprivation, visceral and muscle lipid reserves contributed most to energy metabolism. Similarly, other studies on various salmonid species have reported that food deprivation is responsible for the overall reduction of total fillet fat content as a result of reduced fillet lipid content and reduced body weight (Einen et al. 1998; Cook et al. 2000; Regost et al. 2001; Turchini et al. 2004; Morkore et al. 2008). What is particularly interesting is that whilst there is evidence that food depri- vation in rainbow trout plays a major role in affecting the transcription rate of several genes (Salem et al. 2007) and also affects a large number of plasma, liver and muscle metabolites (Kullgren et al. 2010), the actual modification of the fatty acid composition during food deprivation is, thus | Khác | |||||||
16:0 13.98 ± 0.02 14.12 ± 0.59 ns 14.03 ± 0.28 13.65 ± 0.14 ns 1.01 ± 0.04 0.97 ± 0.03 ns 18:1n-9 25.97 ± 0.24 26.69 ± 0.28 ns 26.53 ± 0.14 25.93 ± 0.38 ns 1.03 ± 0.00 0.98 ± 0.02 * 18:2n-6 18.85 ± 0.18 22.08 ± 0.81 * 20.60 ± 0.33 22.41 ± 0.46 * 1.17 ± 0.04 1.09 ± 0.03 ns 18:3n-3 7.75 ± 0.07 9.47 ± 0.47 * 8.81 ± 0.16 9.63 ± 0.17 * 1.22 ± 0.07 1.09 ± 0.04 ns 20:4n-6 0.52 ± 0.01 0.42 ± 0.02 ** 0.46 ± 0.01 0.44 ± 0.01 ns 0.82 ± 0.04 0.97 ± 0.02 * 20:5n-3 2.27 ± 0.03 1.93 ± 0.02 *** 2.03 ± 0.04 2.06 ± 0.07 ns 0.85 ± 0.01 1.01 ± 0.05 * 22:5n-3 1.27 ± 0.00 0.95 ± 0.02 *** 1.10 ± 0.01 1.07 ± 0.02 ns 0.75 ± 0.02 0.98 ± 0.03 ** | Khác | |||||||
22:6n-3 9.43 ± 0.14 7.84 ± 0.13 *** 8.05 ± 0.05 7.42 ± 0.12 ** 0.83 ± 0.00 0.92 ± 0.02 * SFA 20.91 ± 0.01 20.61 ± 0.87 ns 21.06 ± 0.39 20.40 ± 0.19 ns 0.99 ± 0.04 0.97 ± 0.02 ns MUFA 35.18 ± 0.32 32.65 ± 0.62 * 34.14 ± 0.20 32.74 ± 0.55 ns 0.93 ± 0.01 0.96 ± 0.02 ns PUFA 43.91 ± 0.32 46.73 ± 1.46 ns 44.79 ± 0.47 46.86 ± 0.63 ns 1.06 ± 0.03 1.05 ± 0.02 ns n-6 C 18 PUFA 19.06 ± 0.19 22.35 ± 0.80 * 20.85 ± 0.33 22.70 ± 0.48 * 1.17 ± 0.04 1.09 ± 0.03 ns n-3 C 18 PUFA 8.18 ± 0.06 9.88 ± 0.55 * 8.98 ± 0.16 9.96 ± 0.09 ** 1.21 ± 0.08 1.11 ± 0.02 ns n-6 LC-PUFA 2.46 ± 0.01 2.54 ± 0.05 ns 2.52 ± 0.01 2.43 ± 0.09 ns 1.03 ± 0.02 0.97 ± 0.03 ns n-3 LC-PUFA 14.21 ± 0.15 11.96 ± 0.19 *** 12.44 ± 0.03 11.77 ± 0.06 ** 0.84 ± 0.00 0.95 ± 0.01 ***Data represent means ± standard error (n = 3; N = 6). Within each couple of data set, the results of the independent T-test are reported as:*P < 0ặ05, **P < 0ặ01, ***P < 0ặ001; ns = not significant.Table 9 The fillet fatty acid composition (% w/w; selected fatty acid and fatty acid classes only) observed in treatments UF/FO and VO/FO at day 56, and computed by the dilution model using data relative the entire experimental finishing period (day 0–56). The variation between observed and computed values (= observed computed) is also reported and analysedUF/FO VO/FO VariationComputed Observed T-test Computed Observed T-test UF/VO VO/FO T-test14:0 1.76 ± 0.03 2.05 ± 0.10 * 2.01 ± 0.03 2.08 ± 0.16 ns 1.17 ± 0.08 1.04 ± 0.09 ns | Khác | |||||||
16:0 13.23 ± 0.10 13.41 ± 0.28 ns 13.69 ± 0.09 13.94 ± 0.60 ns 1.01 ± 0.02 1.02 ± 0.05 ns 18:1n-9 24.98 ± 0.11 25.35 ± 0.21 ns 25.61 ± 0.10 26.14 ± 0.12 * 1.01 ± 0.01 1.02 ± 0.00 ns 18:2n-6 22.32 ± 0.27 21.04 ± 0.43 ns 20.48 ± 0.23 20.85 ± 1.50 ns 0.94 ± 0.03 1.02 ± 0.08 ns 18:3n-3 9.92 ± 0.11 8.86 ± 0.29 * 8.84 ± 0.09 8.74 ± 0.74 ns 0.89 ± 0.04 0.99 ± 0.09 ns 20:4n-6 0.47 ± 0.01 0.48 ± 0.03 ns 0.49 ± 0.01 0.48 ± 0.02 ns 1.03 ± 0.04 0.97 ± 0.04 ns 20:5n-3 1.84 ± 0.04 2.36 ± 0.08 ** 2.06 ± 0.04 2.06 ± 0.08 ns 1.28 ± 0.03 1.00 ± 0.04 ** | Khác |
TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN
TÀI LIỆU CÙNG NGƯỜI DÙNG
TÀI LIỆU LIÊN QUAN